-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greg Folkert wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 05:02 -0500, Robert D. Crawford wrote: >> Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Greg Folkert wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 23:43 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>>> Just for the fun of it, I'd be interested in a little poll: >>>>> 1 - are you generally in favor or against the GPLv3? >>>> Yes. >>> That answer says nothing. Analogy: Do you prefer chocolate or vanilla >>> ice cream? Yes. >> Actually, the answer _does_ mean something. In programming terms, if a >> is true or b is true then the whole statement returns true. >> >> It is a joke. > > Cool. someone got it. They were an *OR* statement. There should actually > be 4 questions there.
I get it, but you still didn't answer the poll. So let's put it this way: Are you in favor of the GPLv3 (y/n)? Do you prefer for things to stay with GPLv2 (y/n)? Do you think that all of this is nonsense and irrelevant (y/n)? Are we board because there are so few questions being asked (y/n)? Now there are four questions. :; Joe - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGE7hqiXBCVWpc5J4RAqdxAJ4udNes/m6KcqUgTWvh4jxvoeR+hACgn9fL Vj0LCFE09cNXnOjQVzTkOFs= =jpdL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
