In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not about MTAs and SMTP here. This is about e-mail headers and MUAs. > >> That's a large enough hurdle that I think it safe to say the horse >> has left the barn on this one a long time ago. Continuing to insist >> that things _should_ have been different, long past the point where >> that is feasible, only makes us look foolish. In that, we have been >> successful. > > This thread started with complaining about non-existent Reply-To: headers > set by the list. Some people, including me, say that there are much better > ways to solve the mailing list reply problem. > Maybe you should read this thread again. Forgive me if I am missing something obvious, but I read this list as a newsgroup via gmane. This means I can use a 'proper' usenet news client, slrn in my case, which seems so much easier to use than any MUA I can think of. But YMMV of course. -- Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK. Debian on NSLU2: http://slug.bobcox.com/ http://pippin.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
