-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Roberto � wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 02:21:34PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote: >> The OP could have presented his request differently, but I don't think >> a binary answer in the spirit of "love it or leave it" is particularly >> helpful. The method of handling Reply-To: in this mailing list is in >> the minority, and even if people believe it to be better, that puts the >> burden of explanation on us. Having the question come up over and over >> again, followed by a generally unsuccessful attempt to convince the >> questioner that everyone else does it wrong, is the price of doing >> things this way. >> > Actually, no, the burden is not on us. It is really quite simple. When > you join a group, you adapt to *its* norms and conventions. If you > don't like, then you are free to leave. Now, asking (politely) for an > explanation is usually not a problem. However, starting off with "this > is broken, it needs to change" is not usually welcomed unless you happen > to carry a great deal of influence in the group. > > Regards, > > -Roberto >
Thank you Roberto. - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGDWuoiXBCVWpc5J4RAhcwAKCac+bQagQI3oKKsV1inLlaNsPErACgxvGQ xLDbUrwOBYJON/CPoGU6MHE= =OBrI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
