All I want is to plug-in my modem, give command(s) (can any one tell me what will be those) so that Debian could recognize my new modem, and then I can make dial-up connection settings and use internet.
Broadband is not cheap for average user, in this part of world :) Thanks --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 946 > > Today's Topics: > Re: REALLY OT: News Flash [ Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y, ACPI, [ Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debi [ Max Hyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: /dev/tty perms for xlinks2 [ Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: getmail configuration (How to ru [ Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: Apt-listbugs Problems (OK) [ David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: /dev/tty perms for xlinks2 [ Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: nVidia MCP55 (was: Slow internet [ "Dave Stephenson" <dastephenson232@ > ] > Re: nVidia MCP55 (was: Slow internet [ Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: Hardware Change .... How to upda [ Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: nVidia MCP55 (was: Slow internet [ Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: nVidia MCP55 (was: Slow internet [ "Dave Stephenson" <dastephenson232@ > ] > Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debi [ Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: getmail configuration (How to ru [ Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: getmail configuration (How to ru [ Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Looking for a RTSP proxy [ Marco De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debi [ Roberto =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=2E_S=E1nch > ] > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:35:57 -0500 > From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: REALLY OT: News Flash > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/27/07 15:28, Paul E Condon wrote: > [snip] > > > > As to the respect for all Prophets, 'the Prophet' always means > > Mohammed. Mohammed is the last in a sequence of prophets, not merely > > the most recent. There will be no more prophets, according to their > > belief. The job of revealing stuff to mankind is done. Any differences > > in the several revelations are always resolved in favor of the last > > prophet. He is surely the greatest prophet. There is not much > > room for compromise in this position that I can see. When muslims > > speak of tolerance, it is not in the same sense as that of Catholics > > tolerating Jews in the modern world. Unbelievers are tolerated only if > > they have been given a special protected status by the Sultan (no > > democracy here). This tolerance is out of respect for the Sultan, not > > out of respect of some idea of human rights. It is a very different > > world view from that of modern Europe, or America. In nature (red in > > tooth and claw) it may have greater survival value than my own > > beliefs, or that of Christians or Jews. > > That last sentence is very insightful. > > - -- > Ron Johnson, Jr. > Jefferson LA USA > > Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. > Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFGCYAtS9HxQb37XmcRAqYOAKC1Yl0DqRWO2HUUO2YGEH7jnvt9SACfW70t > uu5rO1UEv3Crvki1sT6hxJ8= > =QssJ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:30:42 -0400 > From: Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y, ACPI, and uswsusp > > Wayne Topa wrote: > > Nick Lidakis([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > >> Celejar wrote: > >> > >>> In 2.6.18, it's under 'Power Management Options'. Check 'Software > >>> Suspend'. > >>> > >>> Celejar > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> No. It is not. That's why I went to the trouble of downloading 2.6.20 > >> from kernel.org. These are my options in either kernel: > >> > > > > Yes it is if your using a Debian kernel > > > > uname -a > > Linux buddy 2.6.18 #1 SMP Sat Feb 10 20:09:49 EST 2007 i686 GNU/Linux > > > > less /boot/config-2.6.18 > > <snip > > > # > > # Power management options (ACPI, APM) > > # > > CONFIG_PM=y > > CONFIG_PM_LEGACY=y > > # CONFIG_PM_DEBUG is not set > > CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y > > CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION="" > > CONFIG_SUSPEND_SMP=y > > > > # > > # ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support > > # > > CONFIG_ACPI=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS=y > > # CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP is not set > > CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_HOTKEY=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_IBM=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0 > > # CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set > > CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y > > CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_SBS=m > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > I posted clearly that those options were not available and even copied > over the menuconfig screen in my previous post. So, you telling me that > the options are there helps me little. What I am asking (and, yes, I did > try Google) is: I'm I misconfiguring the kernel config in such a way > that those options don't show up? > > Here: > > # > # Power management options (ACPI, APM) > # > CONFIG_PM=y > CONFIG_PM_LEGACY=y > # CONFIG_PM_DEBUG is not set > > # > # ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support > # > CONFIG_ACPI=y > # CONFIG_ACPI_AC is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY is not set > CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=y > # CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_HOTKEY is not set > CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=y > # CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK is not set > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y > CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=y > # CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_IBM is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA is not set > CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0 > # CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set > CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y > CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y > CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y > CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER=y > # CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_SBS is not set > > > > See? No options for software suspend. > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:14:35 -0400 > From: Max Hyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock > > Michael Pobega wrote: > > Debian, on the other hand, only gets negative PR. > > That's largely true. Every review I've read leaves the > impression that Debian is problematic, even though the > review mentions some (often many) good points. > > > Outside of the Debian community nobody really gives Debian > > a chance. > > So an interesting question is: How do people start using > it? ISTM there are three ways: > a) talking to Debian users, > b) having it installed on their system by someone > else, or > c) using a Debian-based system (Ubuntu, Linspire, > whatever), and at some point, finding it > unsatisfying, migrating to the original. > > As a result, Debianistas leave for other distributions > less frequently than folks leave other distributions for > another (any other). So it seems Debian is, in engineering > terms, a GNU/Linux-user sink. They may bounce around other > distributions, but when they get to Debian, they stay here. > > > [Reviewers] don't understand the idea of the Debian > > release schedule; It's aimed at servers, NOT home > > computers. > > This one I disagree with. I've never heard a developer > say ``I'm building this for server admins.'' It's always > ``I'm building the best damn' GNU/Linux system there is.'', > where ``best'' is defined as Free-est and most stable. This > just happens to result in the distribution most useful for > servers, but it's not built for them. I run it on my home > computers, and feel no bias against that use. > > IANADBIUWAIWTDP* We shall release no Debian before its > time. > > -- > Best wishes, > > Max Hyre > > > * ``I am not a dev, but I'll use "We" as in "We the Debian > people"'' :-) > > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:59:11 -0500 > From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: /dev/tty perms for xlinks2 > > Andrei Popescu wrote: > > Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> A few days ago xlinks2 was mentioned on this list and I decided to > >> give it a try. > >> > >> When I try to run it from within X as a normal user, no problem. > >> > >> When I try to run it outside of X as root, no problem. > >> > >> When I try to run it outside of X as a normal user, I get an error > >> about opening /dev/tty0 because of permission issues. > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /dev/tty0 > >> crw-rw---- 1 root root 4, 0 2007-03-07 10:04 /dev/tty0 > >> > >> I could change the group to "tty" or something and then add my normal > >> user into that group, but is there perhaps a > >> better/safer/more-canonical way? > >> > > > > Interesting. On my system: > > > > ls -l /dev/tty2 > > crw------- 1 amp77 tty 4, 2 2007-03-27 23:20 /dev/tty2 > > > > What are you running (stable, testing, ...?) > > > > Etch > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /dev/tty2 > crw------- 1 westk tty 4, 2 2007-03-26 14:13 /dev/tty2 > > On this box, tty2 is the only file owned by me and the group tty; all > others are root.root (until you get to the tty[a..z] group, which is > then root.tty). > > -- > Kent > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:11:16 +0200 > From: Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: getmail configuration (How to run fetchmail as daemon at > startup) > > On 2007-03-26 17:49:38 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > > Also, I was unconvinced by the reasoning of several posters that > > they use fetchmail and have never been bothered by losing email: If > > I were losing email, how would I know? [...] > > If you don't receive anything, this may be an indication. FYI, when > I tried fetchmail for the first time, I lost all my mail that was > retrieved by fetchmail. I immediately switched to getmail (though > it is written in Python) and never went back to fetchmail. > > > Anyway, others who were also frightened by the bad things said about > > fetchmail can try my recipe for moving to getmail but keeping exim, > > procmail, and spamassassin. > > BTW, I also lost mail due to procmail. Twice. This was because of > typos in my procmailrc, e.g. a missing backslash at the end of a > line. Though procmail detected a problem with the syntax, it ignored > the incorrect lines instead of putting the mail back in the queue. > After the second time, I wrote a small procmailrc checker[*] (based > on heuristics), automatically called during a "svn commit". I did > other mistakes, but they were all found by my procmailrc checker. > Now, I still don't like the way procmail works (in particular, LOG > is used for two different things -- a really bad design), but I use > it for "historical reasons". > > [*] http://www.vinc17.org/unix/#pmchecker > > I also lost mail due to spamassassin (well, I could retrieve it > in my junk mailbox, hoping I didn't miss any important message), > because the version in Debian/stable was out-of-date. > > -- > Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> > 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> > Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:14:13 +0200 > From: David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Apt-listbugs Problems (OK) > > > I can get reports for one (count 'em) upgrade at a time. Attempts at more > > will time out with a failed HTTP Get. > > > > Worked last week. What gives? > Seems to be working now. SIte problem? > > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:48:05 +0300 > From: Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: /dev/tty perms for xlinks2 > > Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> A few days ago xlinks2 was mentioned on this list and I decided to > > >> give it a try. > > >> > > >> When I try to run it from within X as a normal user, no problem. > > >> > > >> When I try to run it outside of X as root, no problem. > > >> > > >> When I try to run it outside of X as a normal user, I get an error > > >> about opening /dev/tty0 because of permission issues. > > >> > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /dev/tty0 > > >> crw-rw---- 1 root root 4, 0 2007-03-07 10:04 /dev/tty0 > > >> > > >> I could change the group to "tty" or something and then add my > > >> normal user into that group, but is there perhaps a > > >> better/safer/more-canonical way? > > >> > > > > > > Interesting. On my system: > > > > > > ls -l /dev/tty2 > > > crw------- 1 amp77 tty 4, 2 2007-03-27 23:20 /dev/tty2 > > > > > > What are you running (stable, testing, ...?) > > > > > > > Etch > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /dev/tty2 > > crw------- 1 westk tty 4, 2 2007-03-26 14:13 /dev/tty2 > > > > On this box, tty2 is the only file owned by me and the group tty; all > > others are root.root (until you get to the tty[a..z] group, which is > > then root.tty). > > > > I only checked tty2 because that's where I'm logged in and xlinks2 > works (no mouse, but still). Or am I missing something? Just for > completeness: > > $ ls -l /dev/tty0 > crw-rw---- 1 amp77 amp77 4, 0 2007-03-27 22:03 /dev/tty0 > > $ id > uid=1000(amp77) gid=1000(amp77) > groups=20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),30(dip),44(video),46(plugdev),1000(amp77) > > Regards, > Andrei > -- > If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. > (Albert Einstein) > > Date: 27 Mar 2007 14:14:37 -0700 > From: "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: nVidia MCP55 (was: Slow internet on AMD64 running Etch) > > I feel like I am missing something obvious. > > here is my interfaces file: > > > # The loopback network interface > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > # The primary network interface > #allow-hotplug eth0 > #iface eth0 inet dhcp > > auto eth0 > > #force higher speed in spite of signal peak & dhcp > #mtu 1500 > > > iface eth0 inet dhcp > pre-up /sbin/ifconfig $IFACE mtu 1500 > > > and here is the result of ifconfig: > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:18:F3:86:8C:92 > inet addr:192.168.0.7 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask: > 255.255.255.0 > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:576 Metric:1 > RX packets:1135 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:327004 (319.3 KiB) TX bytes:126844 (123.8 KiB) > Interrupt:58 Base address:0xe000 > > I tried moving the auto eth0 line around, but that either did nothing > or broke the network. > > Thanks again, > Dave > > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:53:55 +0300 > From: Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: nVidia MCP55 (was: Slow internet on AMD64 running Etch) > > "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I feel like I am missing something obvious. > > > > Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept > variables? Maybe $IFACE was meant to be replaced by the relevant > interface name. > > HTH, > Andrei > -- > If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. > (Albert Einstein) > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:54:13 +0200 > From: Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Hardware Change .... How to update > > Khurram Pirzada: > > > > What must I do for my Debian to see new modem and install/use it for > > 56k connection? > > What exactly are you expecting Debian to do? If you are running a stock > kernel, you probably only need to install the software you want to use > with the modem and use it. I don't know your hardware, though. It's been > some time since I had anything to do with modems. :) > > J. > -- > Thy lyrics in pop songs seem to describe my life uncannily accurately. > [Agree] [Disagree] > <http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html> > > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:49:47 +0300 > From: Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: nVidia MCP55 (was: Slow internet on AMD64 running Etch) > > "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 27, 4:00 pm, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I feel like I am missing something obvious. > > > > > > Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept > > > variables? Maybe $IFACE was meant to be replaced by the relevant > > > interface name. > > > > post-up works! > > > > I wonder why mahy other sources sugested pre-up, Has something > > changed? > > I only thought if DHCP is the culprit than it would make sense to > change the MTU *after* you get the settings from the server. > > Regards, > Andrei > -- > If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. > (Albert Einstein) > > Date: 27 Mar 2007 15:12:36 -0700 > From: "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: nVidia MCP55 (was: Slow internet on AMD64 running Etch) > > On Mar 27, 4:00 pm, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I feel like I am missing something obvious. > > > > Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept > > variables? Maybe $IFACE was meant to be replaced by the relevant > > interface name. > > post-up works! > > I wonder why mahy other sources sugested pre-up, Has something > changed? > > Thanks again, > Dave > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:06:03 -0400 > From: Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:14:35PM -0400, Max Hyre wrote: > > Michael Pobega wrote: > > > > > [Reviewers] don't understand the idea of the Debian > > > release schedule; It's aimed at servers, NOT home > > > computers. > > > > This one I disagree with. I've never heard a developer > > say ``I'm building this for server admins.'' It's always > > ``I'm building the best damn' GNU/Linux system there is.'', > > where ``best'' is defined as Free-est and most stable. This > > just happens to result in the distribution most useful for > > servers, but it's not built for them. I run it on my home > > computers, and feel no bias against that use. > > > > IANADBIUWAIWTDP* We shall release no Debian before its > > time. > > > > Debian Stable IS aimed for servers and not home computers. What I > meant by what I said is that the reviews always aim themselves at > Debian Stable, which is, let's call it, the "server branch" of > Debian's three branches. > > But when people review Debian they compare Debian Stable against > Ubuntu 6.10 (Or the upcoming 7.04, which isn't even OUT yet) and > always say how Debian is an outdated distro. They fail to understand > the Debian release cycle, and the way packages make their way through > the three (Four if you count experimental) branches of Debian. > > In other words: Reviewers compare Debian stable against Ubuntu's beta > releases, which is an unfair comparison. > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:47:30 -0500 > From: Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: getmail configuration (How to run fetchmail as daemon at > startup) > > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 18:15 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:06 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > > Paul Stolp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I would think that this would then use exim's spam and > > > > > virus checking (I actually don't have that going > > > > > through exim.) > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps I'm missing the point ... can spam and viruses > > > > > be rejected at SMTP time with fetchmail? > > > > > > > > SMTP? fetchmail is using POP3 to retrieve mails and rejection > > > > by exim before receiving them is pretty pointless. > > > > > > How is it pointless if you want your incoming mail (via getmail) > > > scanned for viruses/spam along with any other mail received (via > > > SMTP) by the system? > > > > Sorry, it does make sense in an environment where you receive mail via > > SMTP. But for the ones received via POP3 it's too late because they are > > already on your system and you don't get to reject them before > > receiving. This is what I meant. > > The point you've been trying to make all through this thread is I think > starting to become clear to me (everyone cheer now), because I didn't > realize think about mail being scanned for spam before a full message is > received. Is it true that in the case of getmail (POP3) sending a > (full) message to the recipient via sendmail, a spam checker will not do > anything? (If you know of any good general/overall mail docs...) > > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:08:55 +0300 > From: Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: getmail configuration (How to run fetchmail as daemon at > startup) > > Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The point you've been trying to make all through this thread is I > > think starting to become clear to me (everyone cheer now), because I > > didn't realize think about mail being scanned for spam before a full > > message is received. Is it true that in the case of getmail (POP3) > > sending a (full) message to the recipient via sendmail, a spam > > checker will not do anything? (If you know of any good > > general/overall mail docs...) > > I don't think I understand what you mean. Here is how I see it: > > 1. You receive mail via SMTP. You get the chance to reject the mail > before getting it on your system so you can save some bandwidth > > 2. You receive mail via POP3/IMAP. Unless you use some programs > like mailfilter (suggested elsewhere in this thread) you already have > the spam on your system so it doesn't matter where you do the filtering > (getmail, MTA, MDA, MUA, ...). My choice would be in getmail or MDA > (maildrop). > > However, in a *mixed* environment it makes sense to implement the > filtering once (MTA for the added benefit on point 1.) and use the same > for getmail. > > What I don't think is optimal is to redirect *all* your mails through an > MTA like exim/postfix/... just to do some filtering. Getmail can do > this on its own just fine (well not the actual filtering, but then > neither does exim/postfix), no need for the added complexity. > > Regards, > Andrei > -- > If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. > (Albert Einstein) > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:31:23 GMT > From: Marco De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Looking for a RTSP proxy > > Hi, > I need to install a RTSP proxy on a Debian Sarge machine (but I could > have an Etch one available, too), to allow access to rtsp:// RealVideo > content from Windows clients in a LAN where web access happens through > Squid on that same Sarge machine. > > The only solution, by searching on Google, seems to be > http://rtspproxy.berlios.de/ > But I cannot make it work on Debian, neither Sarge, nor Etch. Not even > trying to build it from source (you can read the details of my tries > here: http://www.nabble.com/Using-rtspproxy-on-Debian-p9471009.html ). > > Does anyone know if a RTSP proxy is readily available for Debian, or how > to work around the problems I encountered when trying rtspproxy? > > Thanks. > > -- > Ciao, > Marco. > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:37:18 -0400 > From: Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 07:06:03PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote: > > > > In other words: Reviewers compare Debian stable against Ubuntu's beta > > releases, which is an unfair comparison. > > > That sort of thing often makes me think that the reviewers have some > sort of axe to grind against Debian. > > Regards, > > -Roberto > > -- > Roberto C. Sánchez > http://people.connexer.com/~roberto > http://www.connexer.com > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a PS3 game guru. Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games. http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
