-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kent West wrote: [...] > In short, there's too much that can go wrong if you don't pay attention, > so I personally would not go the route of automation. Others may disagree. I was wondering if there would be any issues like that. Can you elaborate a little on the kinds of things that might go wrong? I must admit that when I do run apt-get update/upgrade, I don't always look over things thoroughly.
The machine, by the way, is mostly for experimental use, so I can learn about the GNU/Linux world (having spent most of my computer days on... that other OS). > Every couple of years we tinker with using encryption on our email at > the university campus where I work; we'd love to get everyone using > encryption. But it's just too complex for the average PhD. LOL - -- Jim Hyslop Dreampossible: Better software. Simply. http://www.dreampossible.ca Consulting * Mentoring * Training in C/C++ * OOD * SW Development & Practices * Version Management -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGCJSrLdDyDwyJw+MRAjG0AKCbK6qWyltJPHUj4FWSpdjAmylvEACfUubN aOQLLZY1KazKZ3IMpC1T/94= =dnYx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
