On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:59:00 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:56:51PM -0400, Celejar wrote: >> >> It's not a veto issue; the constitution (Article 2 Section 2 Clause 2) >> states: >> >> He [the President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent >> of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators >> present concur; >> >> So the power is his, although he needs the 'advice and consent' of the >> Senate; if he's not interested, there's no treaty. I don't think >> there's any possibility of veto. >> > OK. I had forgotten about that. ..there's also the military command chain procedures, arresting and replacing etc a "clearly incompetent, disabled or war criminal (supreme or not) commander", AFAIK all NATO members had those in place in the 1980ies. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
