-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bill wrote: > On Wed, 2007-14-03 at 10:45 -0400, Celejar wrote: >> What is this all about? I've been following d-u pretty closely >> recently, and I haven't seen much DT discussion here. >> >> Celejar >> > > Ideally, bridging the gap. > > Not that I've any inflated sense of my own importance, or > ability to resolve the problem, but perhaps the most important > thing Anthony Towns can do _before_ the election is to get the > release process back on track. > > Most of us have been very patient, and have faith that etch will > happen when it's ready. But, if the strike drags on into the new > leaders term, then it's harmful. > > The right thing to do is to get back on track now. > > DU is perhaps the right place to start such a process: to guage > the mood of the users as a whole and hopefully provide the > necessary incentive - if one is needed - to move things forward. > > b.
Personally, I would prefer not to have a dunk-tank flame war showing up in d-u, as it's a dev issue, not a user one. I'm sure the user community is anxiously awaiting Etch, but the consensus here is AFAIK, it'll be ready when it's ready and we will wait. Joe - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF+BxiiXBCVWpc5J4RAlKzAJ9NPbyhC8Td36lwxBT9aCvmhdlSEgCcCMJR hI8EOHVAJqMvNSP4sIlW7c8= =e70q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
