-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/13/07 23:33, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:52 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: >> Paul Johnson wrote: >>> Why not just go bioethanol in a larger percentage year round? Portland is, >>> and it might go statewide by the end of the session. Gasoline sales are >>> banned here for the better. >> Probably because to produce 1 gallon of bio you need to use 1 gallon of >> gasoline. It's completely 0-sum right now. > > Actually there is about a 7% loss right now. So 1 gallon of Ethanol > equates to a loss of energy rather than a gain.
But that doesn't matter. What matters is that socialist control freaks get to tell you what to do. But you knew that... ;) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF931cS9HxQb37XmcRAn4jAKCTiG+nVfoCrhP0G6M4L69GLWA7iwCgihJn jAFo1cry5CwDnlr1l3GU0qI= =HVHl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
