> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:32:25 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ben Humpert 
> wrote:> >> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:44:46 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 
> Ben Humpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > > I'd love to use the Etch 
> installer...if I could ever get it.> > I> > > > used the etch installer last 
> night and it worked flawlessly. Why> > > > can't you > get it?> > > kinda 
> hard to find :) the webmaster of debian.org should add three> > tiny links: 
> a) get stable (sarge) here, b) get testing (etch) here,> > c) get unstable 
> (sid) here. each link directs to the first page of> > "get debian" for each 
> version ... very simple but perhaps to> > difficult for them...dunno> > 
> Testing and unstable shouldn't be easy to find because they are not> meant 
> for everyone to use. If you are advanced enough to use them you> will find 
> them ;)> > Well, then the debian guys should fix this decades old sarge 
> installer - OR - merge it with the etch installer; it just takes some hours 
> to do this. sata is already established enough to support it. its a shame to 
> direct users to testing only to get sata support and to tell that it should 
> be "hidden" from beginners.> >> Regards,> Andrei> P.S. Does msn have a config 
> option to not remove line breaks? (In> Outlook it's called: "Remove extra 
> line breaks in text messages"). It> makes your replies very difficult to 
> read.> > Its not MSN/Outlook which kills the whole layout, its your client 
> which cant interpret the mailings correctly. if i check my outbox the mail 
> looks like it should (with line-breaks) and you guys are the first with this 
> problem, i guess its debilian ... errr debian, sorry :)> > The other replies 
> you have already received state why Sarge does what it> does with SATA.> > As 
> for your mail, it's being sent as HTML, which is why you see it> differently 
> than other people (many of whom only read plain text e-mail).> > When viewing 
> your mail with IceDove/Thunderbird, one can choose to view> either one. If I 
> look at the Original HTML, it looks fine, however,> looking at the "as plain 
> text" view, it all runs together.> > The same attitude that you're taking 
> with the e-mail is the same> attitude that many webmasters take. If the 
> clients are using the right> software, everything will look fine. That is not 
> the right attitude to> take because you never know what software people are 
> using, especially> on a mailing list.> 
Like i said, your client can't handle it correctly. It should notice "oh, its 
HTML, lets rewrite it into plain text". You dont have to use the right 
software, just use intelligent software. Perhaps you insert a line break if you 
arrive the end of the window, i dont do this cause of im using a computer and 
not a typewriter! This is a "one line message", no line breaks inserted.
theoretical belief: Would you write in HTML just cause my client cant handle 
plain text? No, you wouldn't!

Reply via email to