Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: >> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >> >> >> Why not make the install disk also a live one? Ubuntu does this. >> >> >> > OK. So go use Ubuntu. >> > >> > Seriously, Ubuntu supports like two or three hardware architectures. >> > Debian supports like 13. A live CD doesn't make sense on all of those >> > and probably isn't possible on others. >> > >> >> This does not make any sense. The live CD need not support all the >> architectures. It can as well support just 2 or 3 architectures and >> mention so. Just because Debian is being run on 13 architectures does not >> mean that the live CD also has to run on that many architectures. If it >> supports all of them, well and good. If it does not, then only users of >> those architectures will get the benefit.... >> > It does make sense. The installer team is already overworked. If you > volunteered to do the work, I am sure that they would welcome > assistance. >
You are mixing up different topics here. 1. Having a live CD for just a subset of architechtures 2. Installer team needs man power They are related. But they are different. You are basically mixing up cause and effect. raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
