On 06 Jul 2003 04:48:39 -0400, Shaun ONeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Two things that strike me are that uml_net's default permissions
> require you to be root, or in group uml-net .. and uml_net performs
> the tun/tap configuration itself - I'm not sure if the route already
> existing would be enough to break uml_net when it tries to do it
> itself.
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 12:29:55 -0400, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> uml-utilities installs uml-net setuid root and only executable by a
> privileged group. If you want to use preconfigured tap, you can
> dpkg-statoverride it to be not setuid and executable by everyone.
Thanks. The permissions were indeed the issue. Once I added
myself tothe group, it all worked well.
> Now that persistent tap devices are becoming more common, perhaps I
> should reconsider this default. Feedback is welcome.
Well, I don't quite understand the seqience of events here to
comment. Where does umn_net get invoked from? If there is a
preconfigured tap, and I am in the group uml_net, would things work
still?
manoj
--
There can be no twisted thought without a twisted molecule. Gerard
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
