-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/28/07 13:01, Paul Johnson wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > >> On 02/27/07 18:01, Paul Johnson wrote: >>> Ron Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> On 02/26/07 18:27, Paul Johnson wrote: >>>>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:39:40PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: >>>>>>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >>>> [snip] >>>>> Opening another can of worms, it seems like everyone would be a lot >>>>> better >>>>> off if New Orleans was rebuilt further inland. "But it has all this >>>>> history!" So what! So did most Alaskan villages and towns prior to >>>>> the >>>> They are. It's called Baton Rouge. >>>> >>>> But then, the area where N.O. stands is a much better port that >>>> Baton Rouge, which is 90 mile upriver, and having a *large* port at >>>> the mouth of the continent's largest river is advantageous to everyone. >>> So put the port there and the city elsewhere. Kind of like how they do >>> it >>> in Alaska. Nobody lives in Prudhoe Bay, everybody lives four miles south >>> on higher ground in Deadhorse... >> You really need to look at a map before spouting off. > > I did. Where are you getting that I'm wrong on my geography on that one?
A map of Prudhoe Bay or of the New Orleans region? > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF5iDNS9HxQb37XmcRAnayAKC1mbAW9m96W3cFEGA8BKTEaj2qHQCgij1m v1tpAkZEtQvrVO5KlAv9cfA= =3daM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
