On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 21:19 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 02/11/07 20:08, Greg Folkert wrote: > > > > How about a simple wiki-type product. Change tracking and the whole > > sh-bang. It is the whole reason Wikis were created. If not a wiki, a > > A wiki for long, complex and/or important documents? That's crazy.
wikis grew out of Document publishing systems. These things were nasty had huge problems, couldn't do multiple revisions. Think about this, Wiki's can and do have "export this page" options. A good Wiki is transparent, but you do have to know how to use it. Just like Word and its archaic methods. > > proper document library with a document publishing system is easily had > > and setup. Saving into the library rather than a filesystem is all that > > is needed. Heck Exchange is good for SOMETHING, beside e-mail and > > scheduling you know. Lotus Notes does it too, as does Groupwise. > > I didn't know Exchange could do that. It costs more, its called a "document management" or Library or something or other. Groupwise and Lotus Notes have done this far better and for far longer than Exchange. But I think Microsoft has integrated Exchange with Sharepoint to do this now. I've seen it able to do it 5 years ago. It takes a good understanding of setting up a library and forms... Of course, forms are the single worst part of Exchange, hence many don't use it. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] That was as boring as a performance of Richard the 3rd with potatoes for actors. They're all eyes.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
