John Hasler wrote:
John C writes:
By the way several users have stated that it's not about DRM. That may very
well be true, but I have still not found anything that confirmed that
Debian has accepted and/or found that the DRM restrictions did not
apply.
As I understand it GFDL documents with no "invariant sections", no "front
cover texts" and no "back cover texts" are DFSG-compliant. IIRC GFDL
documents with these optional features but with permission to delete them
are also DFSG-compliant.
I don't know what you mean by "...I have still not found anything that
confirmed that Debian has accepted and/or found that the DRM restrictions
did not apply."
It meant that I was still unsure if the Section 2 restriction on
distributing copies on DRM-protected software was still a problem.
After re-reading the link sent to me by Andrew Saunders covering
the vote on that section - I understand that that section of the
GFDL was voted as being in compliance with the DFSG.
Thank you again Andrew, I had misread it the first time.
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
