also sprach Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.02.1959 +0200]:
> > diamond:~# ldd /usr/sbin/tcpdump                                          [307]
> >         libpcap.so.0.7 => /usr/lib/libpcap.so.0.7 (0x42aa7000)
> >         libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x42aaa000)
> >         libaviplaydha-0.7.so.0 => not found
> >         libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x42bba000)
> >         libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x42bdb000)
> >         libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x42bee000)
> >         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x42a8a000)
> > 
> > how weird is that???
> 
> Very!  Any LD_ variables in your environment?

diamond:~# env | grep LD_ || echo no
no

> The search engine at packages.debian.org gives this:
> 
> usr/lib/libaviplaydha-0.7.so.0        libs/libavifile0.7c102
> usr/lib/libaviplaydha-0.7.so.0.0.33   libs/libavifile0.7c102
> 
> That package is only in unstable right now.

Okay.

I am thoroughly confused. I have had what seems to be major
filesystem corruption. Is there any corruption that can happen to
a Linux FS (Reiser, ugh!) which would leave the binary untouched
(MD5sum identical) but cause it's dependencies to go haywire? Btw:
I don't think I ever had libs/libavifile installed. Never.

-- 
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to