On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:53:43PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > I really didn't think I said that. If I did, it was unintended and I > apologize.
It's how I read it, cool if that wasn't your intent. Now back to the problem of licensing. :/ > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0305/msg00598.html > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0305/msg00267.html Interesting to read, but really what a mess! I've forwarded a bunch of it to one of the LDP reviewers to see what can be said. In the mean time the debian-doc has gotten back to me with the current unofficial word: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200304/msg00246.html They're recommending one of two Creative Commons licenses...ironically the CC license page recommends the GNU FDL for documentation. emma -- Emma Jane Hogbin [[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
