* Nate Bargmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] > If the > community decides that IceWeasel shall be the name of the DFSG free > version of Firefox, then I have little problem with it so long as we > are able to (legally) make the connection to its being Firefox without > the branding restrictions.
What confuses me about this is the existence of the GNU fork called Iceweasel. Since the Firefox being considered for Debian will not be the GNU IceWeasel, but instead simply a Firefox stripped of the name and logos (if I have followed the comments on this topic so far), I would think that there would be some real confusion in using this name. I have been wondering why Debian would use a name which is already being used for another project? And what if Debian decides to include a package of the GNU browser later? Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
