On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:58:28 +0200, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 2006-10-17 03:19:23 +0000, s. keeling wrote: >> You're the first person I've seen to describe procmail as >> "underpowered." I would not list that as one of its attributes. >> Perhaps it's difficult to figure out how to get it to do $THAT, but >> (in my experience) it can do $THAT. > I couldn't find how to *both* log something to a file and add some > text to a bounced message, as these two features are both performed > with LOG="...", whether LOGFILE is defined or not. This is easy in mailagent > procmail doesn't know anything about MIME. Hmm. Neither does mailagent by default -- but you can easily build a new command or plugin into mailagent using MIME::* packages. > procmail has a fixed size buffer for user rules. It can be extended > by modifying LINEBUF, but it is difficult to know whether the new > value is sufficient or not, in particular when one modifies rules. Not a problem for mailagent. > One can't easily OR conditions (without bloating the procmailrc). This is trivial. > One can't easily invert a condition on a variable name. This is trivial. > It is difficult to debug a procmailrc file. mailagent has awesome debugging facilities. First, you can trace what rules the mail went through -- and then you can have debug levels set from 1 throu 20, each level getting more and more verbose, to have a fine grained log, almost instruction by source instruction, to track down problems. manoj -- There's a little picture of ED MCMAHON doing BAD THINGS to JOAN RIVERS in a $200,000 MALIBU BEACH HOUSE!! Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]