Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:21:14PM +0100 or thereabouts, Andrew Saunders wr= > ote: > > On 9/26/06, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >It's a non-issue. > > > > I agree. However much you might wish it, list policy is not determined > > by plebiscite. > > It should be, pretty much everything else in the Debian Project calls > for votes in order for a consensus. I see no reason why this list should > be the exception -- After all it is called debian-user, emphasis on "user". > :)
Any correctly functioning democracy (mobocracy?) or republic is constrained by some form of constitution which limits what the mob can do. You wouldn't want the mob to be allowed to vote "people like you" into the ovens, yes? Anyone complaining about spam on the list landing in their mailbox just hasn't learned the value of the linux.debian.* Usenet gateways (or various web-ish alternatives; gmane?). Read the list in a newsreader. No spam downloaded unless you ask to read it. Problem solved. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. Spammers! http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
