On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:33:26 -0500, "Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But once you get a grip and hang on for a while, you realize that >> sacrificing 2% is a piece of cake. >If users value reliably getting their messages more than they value spam >reduction, which seems to be the case, it will cost you. Large system >admins are not fools. They have tried this and people don't accept it. Is that your experience, or speculation?
