Arafangion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The lexmark printers appear to be better designed for recycling and are > cheaper - albit at marginally worse print quality. (Both printers > are very poor quality, so this makes little difference).
Er, are there any popular choices that have _good_ print quality? [My only experience with printers is those at work, which tend to be very high quality, though I assume they're pretty expensive too.] -Miles -- I'd rather be consing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
