-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Le vendredi 08 septembre 2006 à 15:57 +0200, Jochen Schulz a écrit : >> Jordi Carrillo: >>> If packages go from unstable to testing in just 10 days then it's not worth >>> going to unstable, is it? I mean, you can live in the bleeding edge as well >>> being in testing. >> You are forgetting the complicated dependency structure of Debian's >> packages. When a new version of one of the big system components, like >> Gnome, KDE or X enters unstable, it can take a few months for the >> complete upgrade to propagate to testing. > > And is it not "broken is some way" in the meantime? I mean, are the few > months just to move things manually, or to get everything in order > before it's propagated?
I don't know about Testing, but subsystems in Unstable never stay broken for more than a few days. Too many bug reports... - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid? For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFAZ/FS9HxQb37XmcRAkxDAJ0ZKubO0/4VQqU3N3eXieHYcI2EYQCfWfnD q0q0e4Jq9YqGDe/nJcPJURA= =TAZq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
