Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > s. keeling wrote: > > mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're > > an idiot. HTH. Twit. > > Ah, yes, the rational response. Sorry, Mutt does lack. > > It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being > restricted to the command line to get the job done.
It's an MUA. Use SMTP. > It lacks filtering. Like a washing machine sucks as a dishwasher. > It lacks a decent IMAP implementation. Hint, IMAP is not a glorified > POP. Don't care. > It lacks a decent multi-account implementation. Having to configure > every > single item by hand without the concept of account inheritance is a night > mare. You have a ridiculously complicated "system" for organizing your mail, and it's mutt's fault for doing what it does well. No. > You may not *agree* with Matej (or me) but that doesn't change > the fact that people have the opinion, rightly so, that Mutt is > lacking. They're misinformed. Start with the wrong premises and you'll reach the wrong conclusion. Mutt's an MUA. Do one thing, and do it well. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. Spammers! http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
