On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Yu,Glen [Ontario] wrote: > I would just like to add that since you're install it on an Intel-based > machine, the "i386" architechture would be a safe bet.
With two caveats: I recently used the i386 installer to install on a 686-based server with SATA drives and 4gig of memory: - during the install, I had to use "linux26" (loading the 2.6 kernel) to recognize the SATA disks - afterwards, I had to download and install the 686 version of the kernel in order to recognize memory above 1gig So.. if either of those apply to you, take note. Miles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
