On Tuesday, 11.07.2006 at 17:59 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Dave Ewart wrote: > > > > OK, that's a reason to avoid PHP, *not* specificially a reason to > > avoid Squirrelmail. Just because PHP may lead to insecure apps does > > not mean that any particular PHP application is badly written, from > > a security point of view. > > I agree. Based on the idea that squirrelmail should be avoided because > it is implemented in PHP, Linux should be avoided since it is > implemnted in C, the most insecure language of all. Any > recommendations on an alternate kernel and alternate C library > (preferrably no implented in C)?
*laughs* Yeah, good point, I hadn't considered the "taking it to extremes" consequences of what I wrote, but you are quite right! Dave. -- Please don't CC me on list messages! ... Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/ Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
