On Jul 8, 2006, at 7:46 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
BTW, I'm running 2.4.27-2-386
That's 2 years old. Any particular reason you aren't running 2.6?
(No, "it's unstable" is *not* a valid reason.")
Tthis is a brand new install....first walk, then run. Alas, the
system only crawls :-<
The only philosophical basis is that 2.4 it is what the installer
installs...and that dist-upgrade doesn't see fit to upgrade it.
The secondary reason is that the machine is destined for a rural area
with 9.6k dial-up access--maybe 14k on a good day. Those comm rates
make ''stable'' a highly desireable feature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
