* Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-02 12:27]: > > Do you think that security support for unstable is good > > enough for this? Or should I just go with stable + > > backports? > > I don't use unstable on servers anymore so I don't know if > security support is good enough, although I know it is > significantly better than it has been in the past, thanks to > the testing security team (who, iirc, also cover sid). > > > ~ vim: set ft=mail tw=70 sw=2 sts=2 et: > > ^^ interesting idea, I think I shall borrow it :)
;-) I've been adding modelines to every file I edit lately. I've come up with a vim function + key mapping to insert a modeline with my preferred settings and the current file type as a comment of the form used by the file type I'm editing (e.g. /* ... */ for C/C++, or # ... for Perl/shell scripts etc.). > I'd just go with stable, keep an eye on the debian-security list and > backport anything that you really need (which should be very > little). As I replied to Johannes Wiedersich (in another thread), I've decided to go with stable and do some backports myself. Many thanks for your insights. - Felix -- Felix C. Stegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://obfusk.net ~ "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature." ~ -- R. Kulawiec ~ vim: set ft=mail tw=70 sw=2 sts=2 et:
pgp3R6l9dt1hi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
