On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:53:31PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > On (18/05/06 00:30), lee wrote: > > Hi, > [snip] > > And then, ssl is only so much secure > [snip] > > I think if you are worried about the security afforded by ssl you might > have to rethink your approach.
Well, I don't know how secure ssl actually is. Afair I've been reading that they came up with hardware devices that can do ssl decoding in realtime. If I'm going to secure it, I want to do it right as far as possible. The other side of the communication is of course the biggest problem, but I don't have influence on that. So you might argue that's it's a very questionable or futile attempt in the first place ... GH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
