On Friday 28 April 2006 02:16, Hal Vaughan wrote: >On Friday 28 April 2006 02:01, Paul Johnson wrote: >> On Thursday 27 April 2006 22:14, Mike McCarty wrote: >> > Well, that's really the context in which I replied. The Right Wing >> > today in the USA are Socialists. >> >> You know nothing of my party or it's politics. Socialists are >> progressive, not conservative. > >I had it figured the other way around: he knows nothing about >Republicans. Either way, comes out the same: He's saying their > similar and in his own statement, he's showing us he doesn't > understand. > >> > I am not. If you are aware of >> > US politics then I generally dislike the policies of the Democrats >> > and the Republicans, because both of them support Socialism. >> >> No, Republicans are not the least bit socialist. They're >> anti-public healthcare, anti-public education, and think >> laissez-faire economics benefits everyone instead of just the >> richest 3% that control 80% of the country's wealth. Republicans >> are pretty much the Socialist antithesis in the US. > >Yes, I'd agree that you can't get much more accurate than that. > >Hal
Well, he could, because its worse than that, 1% of the people here control 90% of the wealth according to some figures I heard on C-SPAN tonight in congressional testimony. Thats not right, and its sure not a democracy. -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
