Mike McCarty wrote: > I understand the situation completely. You apparently do not.
Sorry, no, you so are off your rocker it's not funny. See this, this is
me not laughing.
> If he created (as he said) his *own* files using those tools,
> and not those of his employer, then he used a pirate copy.
Bzt. That would be at the determination of the employer who licensed the
use of that software.
> I am morally certain that the EULA did not include a clause like
> "You are permitted to let other people who do not have a license
> use this software, for their own purposes, so long as you do not
> charge them, and they also use this software for you for your own
> purposes."
Just as I am certain that EULA's don't include clauses like "This can only
be used for the promotion of the business form whom this license has been
granted. Any use outside of aforementioned acceptable use is strictly
forbidden."
And since the software in question wasn't named there's no way you can
justify your position any more than I can mine. Although my position does
have fair use on it's side. So how about you pull your head out of your high
horse's posterior. Trust me, there are no clues in there.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
