On Wednesday 19 April 2006 17:49, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > that. I do know a friend of mine looked (a photo professor) at > > figures and said that the ink in any photo printer was more > > expensive per ounce than the most expensive Parisian perfumes. He > > also told me it costs more per photo to use a home printer to print > > them than it does to use film and have it developed. > > If you exclude the water and alcohol content of the ink (that will > evaporate anyway once the ink is in place, and which is the cheapest > part of ink production), you will find that your printer's ink is > more expensive than platin or almost any other material you could > possibly buy...
Except, maybe, for gold pressed latinum... Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
