"debian" == debian <iwk> writes: debian> Hi there, I'm just ripping a few CDs' with Grip and even debian> with nice level -20 for both ripping & encoding the system debian> "drags" noticeably. The kernel low latency patch should in debian> theory offer a solution by improving on the resposiveness debian> of the system. But does it in practice? Is it really worth debian> the fuss of recompiling the stock (debian) kernel which is debian> working fine? Anyone got any practical experience?
I guess it depends on your hardware. I'll give you my experience and you can go from there. I have fairly fast system: a 7200 RPM IDE drive, a 32x IDE CD devices with an AMD XP2000 (or whatever, I forget, it runs at 1.67 odd Ghz) and the lvcool package to keep CPU temperature down. On this system I use a stock 2.4.18-k7 Woody kernel, and all my music is encoded with ogg. Over the last 15 months since I built this system I've *never* felt I needed the low latency patch. I don't have any idea what kind of hardware you have. But if it is reasonably up to date the first thing I'd check is that DMA is enabled on your drives. A default Woody install will not do this for you automatically. And yes, if I turn DMA off I would think I have a problem moving hunders of megabytes of data around. Cheers! Shyamal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]