Incoming from Dave Sherohman: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 10:07:11AM -0700, s. keeling wrote: > > I'll wager that procmail is one of the better documented utilities out > > there, considering all those writing about its usage. The tiny-tools > > project even supplies an emacs syntax checker mode for rc files > > That's beside the point, IMO. All the documentation and syntax > checkers in the world aren't going to change the fact that procmail's > > :0: > * ^From: AntiSpam UOL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > /dev/null > > (stolen from one of Gene Heskett's recent posts) is more cryptic and
Your opinion. You like tools that speak English. I like tools that work; I don't care what language they speak. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling Please don't Cc: me. - - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
