Lubos Vrbka wrote: >> I use ndiswrapper too, what can I say...it gets the job done. I even >> have WPA support. >> >> If I was to buy a new wireless pccard, it'll definitely get one with >> support under the vanilla kernel...cause I'm lazy :). It's very easy to >> install ndiswrapper module by following its wiki but is *super* easy via >> module-assistant. > > for such cards, ndiswrapper is not needed, i guess... or am i wrong? > > regards, > You're correct, ndiswrapper isn't needed by cards with native support under the vanilla kernel.
I should had written it like this: >> I use ndiswrapper too, what can I say...it gets the job done. I even >> have WPA support. It's very easy to install ndiswrapper module by >>following its wiki but is *super* easy via module-assistant. >> If I was to buy a new wireless pccard, it'll definitely get one with >> support under the vanilla kernel...cause I'm lazy :) hope it helps. jorge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
