On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:22:26 -0400, Dan Jones wrote: >>>I'm told that gcc 3.2 will compile the original source without >>>modification. I may try downgrading my compiler and seeing if >>>that works. >>gcc 3.2 instead of 3.3 indeed works fine; my kernel compiled just >>finished fine with gcc 3.2. Changing anything in the source is a >>little bit out off my league, so I guess I just stick with gcc 3.2 >>for now. Moreover, time is up for today... >Have you tried booting it yet? Would be interested in knowing if it > boots and runs correctly.
gcc 3.2 allows an error-free compile on my system too. However, my system automatically reboots as soon as the kernel is decompressed. This is the same behavior I got when I modified the source to allow it to compile under gcc 3.3. When booting, I get "uncompressing kernel....OK" then black screen for half a second and then the bios bootup screen. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
