Alvin Oga wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Daniel Webb wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:16:29AM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
One nit to pick here:
- find | tar | gpg meeets all of my requirements for most all possible
potential disasters and recovery
As I describe on my backup page, that's a terrible idea. One corrupt bit and
you lose *huge* amounts of data.
if you don't trust find|tar ... you have major problems with the machine's
reliability and these brand new commands nobody used for 30 yrs :-)
Hmm? I agree with him. If you don't fear some corruption, then why
make backups at all?
[snip]
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
