On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:21:08PM +0100, Hugh Saunders wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:40:17PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:41:37AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > Or maybe it's easier to just lobby the various MLM authors to add > > > > List-Id? If so, where could I find a list of MLMs and their > > > > respective authors? > > > > > > When you find a list that doesn't, point out the RFC and ask the list > > > operator to enable it. If he says there's no option, find out what > > > he's running and file their equivilent of a normal bug with it's > > > maintainer. That RFC's been on the standards track for two years now > > > without getting nixed, if MLM maintainers haven't gotten around to > > > implimenting it, they need to now. > > > > Er... is debian-user using List-Id? I don't seem to be able to locate it > > in the headers... Might be my eyes, of course, ;-) > im late to this thread so may have missed the point but: > X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > seems to be in the headers or all the emails from debian-user. > That would be a fairly good way of identifying the list?
It is. However, IIUC X-Mailing-List is not an RFC2919 header, whereas List-Id is and that kind of started this thread. David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
