On 12/17/05, [KS] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well the trademark issues reason is understandable as there has been > lots (yes lottttts) of discussion on that topic. So if firefox is > available as 1.4.99+1.5rc3, why is it that an apt-get dist-upgrade does > not replace my mozilla-firefox with firefox? Some info on when/if this > will happen or not would be appreciated.
At the moment, I'm very glad that it doesn't. Aside from a few extensions which didn't have 1.5-compatible versions yet, I couldn't get java working in 1.5. Granted, I would have put more time into it if I were stuck with 1.5, but I was able to downgrade easily back to 1.0.7 with only fairly minor issues. Well, one of those issues would ordinarily garner the advice: create a brand-new profile and re-load everything. I was able to track it down to one extension, though. -- Michael A. Marsh http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~mmarsh http://mamarsh.blogspot.com