Scott Muir wrote:
this is one example of the problem:


        Reading task descriptions... Done
        The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED:
          debconf-utils
        The following NEW packages will be automatically installed:
          centericq-common libcurl3 libgpgme11


Installing various packages kicks out OTHER various packages. in this case,
the debconf-utils pkg

its like there is a battle royale going on with dependencies, and i've been
bitten once bad in the past when i tried installing samba on an ubuntu
machine which it did but not before uninstalling postfix (the MTA) (BAAAD)

Try:

aptitude unmarkauto debconf-utils

I'm guessing you initially installed debconf-utils with apt-get, which doesn't 
set aptitude's special auto/manual flag.  Aptitude then thinks that 
debconf-utils was automatically installed (as a dependency of another package), 
and since no packages currently depend on it, it removes it.  It's a handy 
feature... but somewhat misguided in this case.

this is what j2sdk does sometime after installing nagios:


        The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED:
          libdbd-pg-perl libdbi-perl libnet-daemon-perl libplrpc-perl
        The following NEW packages will be installed:
          sun-j2sdk1.5
        The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed:
          libasound2 libgtk1.2 libx11-6 xlibs
        0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 4 to remove and 0 not upgraded.


which breaks nagios.

Is nagios installed from a .deb?  If so, it should contain dependencies on all the 
packages it needs...  If it did that, aptitude wouldn't decide that they "are 
unused" and would leave them there.

If nagios isn't from a .deb, you'll have to 'unmarkauto' all the packages that 
it depends on...  or make a .deb for it.

TTYL.
--

C. Chad Wallace, B.Sc.
The Lodging Company
http://skihills.com/
OpenPGP Public Key ID: 0x262208A0


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to