On 4 Nov 2005 02:53:36 -0800, Basajaun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > On 11/4/05, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 11:19 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Did you check the sun.com website which claims that Solaris 10 is the > > > > most advanced OS on the planet? Could anyone tell me what grounds is > > > > the claim based upon. I was surprised to see that claim and has anyone > > > > > > Surprised? That someone claims that their product is the greatest? > > > > > > That's very naive. > > > > > > > out there used it to testify on its truthfullness? > > > > > > Why ask us? Have you Googled? > > > > Sorry... I just wanted to get some somments. > > "Sorry"? I hope you are being sarcastic. If anyone, Ron should be sorry > for his bitter reply, not you for your question.
Hey! I got friends... > I guess that Sun does the usual thing, claiming that their product is > The Best(TM). I am hopelessly ignorant, as Ron seems to be, of what the > basis for that claim is, or if there's any at all. > > I hope anyone in the list is more enlightened than me, and can make, > for example, a brief comparison of Debian Etch and Solaris 10. _That_ > would be way more usefull than just calling you "naïve". Nice comment (and defence)... thanks.
