On Fri, 30 May 2003 17:54:21 -0400 Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Chris Metzler wrote: >> .. . .which are not depended on by anything in testing. I don't know >> why libparted1.4 and libparted1.6 are both in testing right now, >> because libparted1.4 looks like it isn't used by anything in testing, >> and actually conflicts with the version of parted that's currently >> in testing. Maybe someone else can explain that. But in the >> meantime, I would think that it should be safe to remove it, which I >> guess was what you tried to do next: > > It's not in testing:
Ah, thanks. I'd checked the packages search webpage, which is still showing it in there (as of 1821 EDT anyway): http://tinyurl.com/d374 It must not have updated yet for some reason. If its removal/replacement was recent, I wonder if the OP got caught by updating the package cache in the middle of the change or something like that. Thanks for the heads-up. -c -- Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove "snip-me." to email) "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
