On Sunday 23 October 2005 12:04, J Merritt wrote: > OK, the lazy unmount via 'umount -l' worked. I was > able to unmount and re-mount two different discs. No > problems reported. I take it this is something that > should not be done under normal circumstances? Is > there any issue with using lazy unmount (I assume it's > called lazy for a reason)? > It's not the preferred solution, no. It's called lazy because you don't have to work to find out which process is hanging on to the mount and stop it. ;-)
Justin Guerin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
