On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:02:14 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:50:53 -0300 > > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > > I'm actually starting to think about giving each > > > > > user their own partition, since it's so little > > > > > hassle. > > > > > > > > > Would that be feasable in an enviroment with 40.000 > > > > mail users ? ;-) > > > > > > Nah. But if you have 40000 mail users, and that > > > translates to 40000 Unix users in that box, well, you > > > could be doing much better :) There are many MTA+MDA > > > +POP/IMAP that do not require such nonsense :P > > > > Whay about nntp? > > What about NNTP? AFAIK it requires exactly one user on the > NNTP server... Although I have never had to deal directly > with setting INN. > > That said, if you meant NNTP access to mail, well, I know > Cyrus IMAPd v2.2 has it (its spool accepts incoming data > over LMTP, IMAP and NNTP, and outgoing over POP3, IMAP and > NNTP). I meant, "do nntd daemons work with A Few Big Files, or One File Per Message? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
