On Sunday 25 September 2005 03:35 pm, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > For / , why not use ext3? > > Agreed. ext3 is stable, quite fast enough (IF you're using kernel 2.6 and > enable all optionals) and it is extremely *safe*. AND it has the best set > of recovery tools I know of, should you actually need them. > > If you are doing a proper install where / contains not much more than /etc, > /lib, /sbin, /bin, /boot and a few other oddities (certianly not /home, > /srv, /usr, /var or /tmp), then you really are better off using ext3 there > for safety.
I disagree. Could you tell me why you present this as fact? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]