On mandag 12 september 2005, 02:07, David Clymer wrote: > but wouldnt it > be much easier to add a ServerAlias to the vitualhost config?
Without trying to respond to the original question, I would like to point out that ServerAliases are eeeevil and architecturally broken. The redirect should have been a 301, otherwise it results in URI aliasing, which is bad: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040816/#uri-aliases I asked Dan Connolly (one of the main web architects) about ServerAlias once, and he said he could see valid uses for it, but the general use as it is now is just architecturally broken. To see why, my previous project at work involved finding and counting which URIs of what sites is broken in Opera, and that was complicated by widespread URI aliasing, it was simply impossible to count that reliably. Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
