On 8/2/05, ke6isf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Ralph Katz wrote: > > > Yet I'm wondering how other sarge users are going to address the > > security concerns? Backport, install from Mozilla tarball, upgrade to > > unstable, change to kmail/konqueror? > > It would seem that the easiest way to deal with this is to go off tree and > use the tarball. > > -Dennis Carr
Thanks for posting this .. I've been wondering why no updates on firefox. In fact, pending updates, I already downloaded and am using the mozilla.org tarball. I highly value having a secure browser, so am willing to spend the extra time making it fit into sarge. I'm not sure I agree that taking the whole version update from moz.org is less desirable than just incorporating the security updates into a "frozen" browser feature package. After all, if your smart enough to install debian, you're smart enough to learn any new browser features. bye,
