Ok, i feel like a jerk for replying to my own email so quick... but here's some info i've dug up:
<faq> Can I use Hula with an existing MTA? Hula provides an MTA by default, but it won't be hard to get Hula to play with an existing MTA. We will be providing instructions for doing this sometime soon, watch this space! </faq> So it's undocumented but i will play around w/ it and try to get it working w/ all my stuff (hopefully not just the mta). Still, if anyone has prior experience or tips that would be a life saver. Thanks! Cameron Matheson On 7/22/05, Cam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm setting up a web server. Everything is finished except for the > webmail portion. The setup i have going on currently is > Postfix/Courier(IMAP and POP)/MySQL(for the virtual users)/Amavis(w/ > ClamAV and Spamassassin). That stuff is all working really great. > The portion i am lacking is webmail. Initially i tried sqwebmail > (courier), but it was just way too ugly and i would feel guilty giving > that to the users. Then i checked out squirellmail, which is a step > in the right direction, although still a little bland (maybe not too > big of a deal?). A friend recommended Hula to me. The interface is > beautiful, and i like a lot of the features. Unfortunately, it seems > that it wants to do *everything* (be it's own mail server, web server, > imap server, etc.). That seems like a lot of crap when i already have > *all* of that stuff working anyway. Would it be worth it to run > anyway? Hula is easily moved to other ports so that you can have the > services running side-by-side, but is it worth it to do it this way? > will i take a huge performance hit? tips or experience would be > appreciated. > > Thanks, > Cameron Matheson >
