-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:47:05AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > Hmm, I'm curious: did you run TMDA locally, or are you saying someone > else running TMDA couldn't email you? (I'm talking about the TMDA > found at http://tmda.net/ )
Neither. I'm saying I refuse to jump through hoops like subscribing to *send* to someone else's mailbox. Screw that. TMDA's also harmful for mailing lists and has a tendancy to spam them occasionally with "confirmation messages." > Really, I don't see how TMDA could be broken WRT your MX record or > lack thereof since TMDA isn't an MTA at all. It's attitude of "deny everything that isn't specifically allowed" and requiring confirmations from the sending party is both a waste of time and bandwith. It also breaks reliable delivery, thus of RFC-2821 and it's predecessors. It's an extremely chickenshit and lossy replacement for procmailing defensively. - -- .''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+jVlMJ5vLSqVpK2kRApO2AKCICn6o6XHL5FkH9ALy1kSPMuqYXQCfV+9Y yQMP9uxsRvoNtT5UkZLR8fs= =78dZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
