On Thu, 26 Nov 1998, BadlandZ wrote:
> I totally agree... If I may suggest, I would say that maybe a "XSB"
> should be formed, separate from "LSB" and the "XSB" can be a "layer"
> added onto the top of the "LSB" at a later date. For the sake of
Generally agreed, but there is one thing more: it is not *only* about
desktop, this is also wider issue of coherent configuration. As this deals
with layers that traditionally are located higher in OS than just above
kernel like LSB, I would rather call it something like "High Level Linux
Interoperability" ("ineroperability", because as we have seen "standard"
is a bit like dirty word among people who primarily want customizability),
with subgroups concentrating on various issues, included, but not limited
to desktop interoperability issues.
Marcin Krol
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hiroshima 45 Tschernobyl 86 Windows 95
