On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
> > steps in bridging linux compatibility. What, if any, is the consensus on
> > the FHS 2.0... do the distributions that are part of the lsb agree to
> > use it?
>
> It was discussed at and shortly after the LI meeting when Bruce presented
> the whole cunning plan. FHS 2.0 is a big help but it might need some
> tightening. Dan Quinlan is conveniently in both the LSB and FHS projects
At present Solaris 2.6 is the best FHS 2.0 compliant OS.
Hugo.
+------------------------+------------------------------+
| Hugo van der Kooij | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Oranje Nassaustraat 16 | http://www.caiw.nl/~hvdkooij |
| 3155 VJ Maasland | (De man met de rode hoed) |
+------------------------+------------------------------+
"Computers let you make more mistakes faster than any other invention in
human history, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila."
(Mitch Radcliffe)
